Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Apr 1999 22:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Alright, who's the smart alleck that fixed NFS this last week? :)
Message-ID:  <199904220556.WAA10644@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <99Apr22.070815est.40329@border.alcanet.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:I'm nothing like an NFS expert, so I may be talking through my hat,
:but...  I presume NFS correctly supports O_APPEND semantics for
:multiple clients (as seen from the server).  In this case, the
:optimization only works when there's only one client machine (though
:possibly multiple processes on that machine) is using write+O_APPEND.
:
:Peter

    I don't this was ever supported or ever will be in the multiple-client
    case.  Maybe eventually with the leasing stuff.  Otherwise, no way.  The
    stateless nature of NFS makes it virtually impossible.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904220556.WAA10644>