Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:51:59 -0700 From: "David E. Thiel" <lx@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE on desktop system Message-ID: <20071001195159.GA69112@redundancy.redundancy.org> In-Reply-To: <20071001185454.GA72080@abigail.blackend.org> References: <20070916061932.GA93480@underworld.novel.ru> <20070918061806.GA85425@blazingdot.com> <20070918004027.G558@10.0.0.1> <20071001101525.GA1530@gothic.blackend.org> <20071001112845.N583@10.0.0.1> <20071001185454.GA72080@abigail.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 08:54:54PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > I use nvidia or nv driver (nvidia one is a bit less worse). The lag can > even appears with 4% of CPU usage according to top(1). > Thanks to your remarks and my tests, I'm now sure it's scheduler > independent. It seems 7-CURRENT is slower than 6.X regarding I/O :( > For info the box is a 1.2GHz Athlon with 1GB of RAM and swap is never > used. This may sound like a silly question, but what terminal emulator are you using? I found that xfce's Terminal gave me awful performance, taking a really long time to redraw, but xterm and roxterm sped things up a lot. I think for me part of this is related to the nvidia driver breakage with the new Xorg. Can you see if you can duplicate that behavior with xterm?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071001195159.GA69112>