Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:51:59 -0700 From: "David E. Thiel" <lx@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>, Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE on desktop system Message-ID: <20071001195159.GA69112@redundancy.redundancy.org> In-Reply-To: <20071001185454.GA72080@abigail.blackend.org> References: <20070916061932.GA93480@underworld.novel.ru> <20070918061806.GA85425@blazingdot.com> <20070918004027.G558@10.0.0.1> <20071001101525.GA1530@gothic.blackend.org> <20071001112845.N583@10.0.0.1> <20071001185454.GA72080@abigail.blackend.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 08:54:54PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > I use nvidia or nv driver (nvidia one is a bit less worse). The lag can > even appears with 4% of CPU usage according to top(1). > Thanks to your remarks and my tests, I'm now sure it's scheduler > independent. It seems 7-CURRENT is slower than 6.X regarding I/O :( > For info the box is a 1.2GHz Athlon with 1GB of RAM and swap is never > used. This may sound like a silly question, but what terminal emulator are you using? I found that xfce's Terminal gave me awful performance, taking a really long time to redraw, but xterm and roxterm sped things up a lot. I think for me part of this is related to the nvidia driver breakage with the new Xorg. Can you see if you can duplicate that behavior with xterm?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071001195159.GA69112>