Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:32:37 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/scrobbler/files patch-scrobbler.c Message-ID: <20051126213237.GA81784@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051126212114.GD39750@lame.novel.ru> References: <200511261720.jAQHKfZc097623@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051126202151.GB80497@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051126204937.GC39750@lame.novel.ru> <20051126210920.GA81275@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051126212114.GD39750@lame.novel.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:21:14AM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Kris wrote: >=20 > > > Should I bump PORTREVISION of xmms-scrobbler and bmp-scrobbler in add= ition? > >=20 > > If the contents of those packages are also changed by this patch > > (doesn't seem likely). See the guidelines in the porter's handbook. >=20 > Oh, I though when I add a patch for a master port it will be used for > slave ports too. Yes -- it wasn't clear that you were talking about slave ports. Unless they override the patch directory they will also be changed and should be bumped too. Kris --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDiNR1Wry0BWjoQKURAooLAJ0V9U8cg4N+VFF1xLeVtoswTnIA/wCgpef0 0rAYnSfgypnTlSQfHuFb0DU= =Fcrl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051126213237.GA81784>