Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:43:37 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mike G <mike@v.gz.ru> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uart and puc attach conflict Message-ID: <20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <025401c5d953$47004480$821cfa9e@mics.msu.su> References: <025401c5d953$47004480$821cfa9e@mics.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:00:14PM +0400, Mike G wrote: > Hello! >=20 > I have a problem with multi-port card based on Nm9845 chip. > It's a card with 4 com-ports. > It perfectly works with puc(4) and sio(4) drivers if they compiled into= =20 > kernel. > or with puc(4) and uart(4) drivers if they loaded manualy. > But if puc(4) and uart(4) are compiled into kernel or loaded from > loader.conf - problem appears. Isn't puc superceded by uart? Why do you need both? Kris --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDXm7JWry0BWjoQKURApTgAJwNSCCVLlm2iX1WYAE2z31/84P4gACg+zpc 7gR1KBZTXnP0QX3RoxkOsvg= =UJkv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051025174337.GA45694>