Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:20:03 +0200 From: Olivier Certner <olce@freebsd.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regression: memory issues on main/arm64 over sched/runq changes Message-ID: <4202236.O2WMGSuNBG@ravel> In-Reply-To: <47418227-3qqn-6890-s365-09149o514rp5@serrofq.bet> References: <43005447-2rq0-6nn2-pnr5-4939s112npr4@yvfgf.mnoonqbm.arg> <8262185.bYQgcRI8ro@ravel> <47418227-3qqn-6890-s365-09149o514rp5@serrofq.bet>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] > Could I simply re-define (or rather backout) af8de65ef23e7e447916370851f39aea3f74e16a > and run with that; would that still be a working combination (just to > try out)? Sorry, just noticed your mail now. Yes, you could do that, but I don't think this will fix your problem. However, the patch at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D51067 should. Could you please test it? -- Olivier Certner [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCQAdFiEEmNCxHjkosai0LYIujKEwQJceJicFAmhdczMACgkQjKEwQJce JidUIBAAnxeElr6ozbvmmgU6YnhGtzrSndMm1FCAA6nUwJgnjeTEG5S7z1vnRn1t +Wl5GK0IfLhBmkctpdS/3x0PvW2Ci5nlZJylmbAn4OZ2DUj7jwTb0L+cg/fB9of3 0qK258jYnJweEvhShtC7yGGhbQz4ep47CjHV8UJFH92pUpKabqcCPHRwmxZCB9Ps 7U4qGYo8vFAWUaKbswU1N/v4wiYHCO+YRHxxPgl1DcV0LILOpx+aJwJqOOOO+qFj 2BsnTaHrwdB9gJA3GlDAFqX9emhatAkmC2dHxsZCe1VwMYGXjzjyJDoCUwzOkIr9 3/kWBgqCWEAOnJUNTQmbEgS/RJtln2AelTfBHGnWzljBN+GaW0RCngK6Bqfk3Vdl chbeoFCbaavfcukMw4RsM8SvciQWKikn08IliwLyR5gr/zVDc9es/yHEOyDOLZ5X 7JIxxQ2rpIMJHugzpg0Uf1JtBejGkIOYybrYVNFcVPDeBF3HAYkS1HGzMTu9zpMR ceQNXyRuDjQzD98YPOBTvEB8qcwfLf+fkaWlAE3RmjVH9z67SA9T2s3gYkPWXMef DlQeEqH0ZbUjLBUH2sKnK9y2OwihS3fOOOvMCVss6hVKao+K5JAcAoYSOGGPH1KB DSgOYWWwKfGVyIiUDu6fESnk+RzufcnA4arKaMnusUkWVZaXIxk= =JdYP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4202236.O2WMGSuNBG>