Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Sep 2004 13:32:50 -0300 (ADT)
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: what is fsck's "slowdown"?
Message-ID:  <20040904133128.I812@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <200409040659.i846x4nM031021@gw.catspoiler.org>
References:  <200409040659.i846x4nM031021@gw.catspoiler.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Don Lewis wrote:

> On  4 Sep, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>>> Would the file system in question happen to be full of UNREF files that
>>> fsck is deleting?
>>
>> mostly 'ZERO LENGTH DIRECTORY' ...
>
> Hmn, this may be something else then, possibly the buffer lookup in
> getdatablk().  It would be very interesting to compile/link a profiled
> version of fsck and see what shows up as the hot spot.  Are you using
> the default value for MAXBUFSPACE (defined in fsck.h).

Everything *should* be default ... I've never modified fsck.h myself, but 
do have a -D flag set in /etc/make.conf to increase KMEM_SIZE so that 
we're able to increase our # of vnodes, so unless it somehow uses that to 
change teh default value ... ?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040904133128.I812>