Date: Wed, 05 Jun 1996 09:37:53 +0700 From: Iwan Leonardus <riwanlky@rad.net.id> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: stable Message-ID: <31B4F301.41C67EA6@rad.net.id>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I 've been heard about this -stable version, I think the -stable code is more suitable for all 'Live' system, while the other can be accepted as other system, especially development, and personal system. In the BSD world, I also heard this BSDI OS as commercial BSD OS, which is suppose to be more 'stable', because all commercial product is mean to work in 'Live' system So, I am wandering what BSDI has that FreeBSD -stable do not have so we have to pay more for BSDI OS. These information is usefull for planning and budgeting for a system connected to Internet. Thanks in advance and best regards Iwan L
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31B4F301.41C67EA6>