Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:08:14 -0400 From: Sean Cavanaugh <millenia2000@hotmail.com> To: Artis Caune <artis.caune@gmail.com>, Chris Telting <christopher@telting.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Router Web Interface? Message-ID: <BAY126-W3130C6C30FAAB5BDF6E5E5CA520@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <9e20d71e0809150149q18a612a8pc3c45911082ec9f2@mail.gmail.com> References: <48CDB059.6070609@telting.org> <48CE03D8.4050406@stupar.homelinux.net> <9e20d71e0809150149q18a612a8pc3c45911082ec9f2@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:49:42 +0300 > From: artis.caune@gmail.com > To: christopher@telting.org > CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Router Web Interface? > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Sasa Stupar <sasa@stupar.homelinux.net> wrote: > > If you use machine only for the router purposes then I suggest you to > > use Monowall. > > or pfSense :) > M0n0wall is more designed for embedded style systems such as low power boxes running from a CompactFlash storage device. pfSense is a fork from M0n0all that the main change is using pf as the filter rather than ipfw. pfSense also has an embedded style image but their main one is a full install (HDD install) that supports extra packages such as Squid or Snort. 1.2-RELEASE of pfSense uses FreeBSD 6.3 where the betas of 1.2.1 use 7.0help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BAY126-W3130C6C30FAAB5BDF6E5E5CA520>