Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Sep 2012 08:25:57 -0300
From:      Mario Lobo <lobo@bsd.com.br>
To:        FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Firefox install problem
Message-ID:  <CA%2ByoEx9iwARWTg8Zbrvq3A2G5d1sHp4X2MLBhGn0xcr3ZrwhPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209042035050.35404@wonkity.com>
References:  <CA%2ByoEx9=SxqLjUGvMZe8137u07PQGX6VC7YC_4EHo6-ehtZEAQ@mail.gmail.com> <44txvds23l.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20120904230305.46a318b6@papi> <CAFuo_fyg610bWotuUw0Yc2sJ=2Ticm35LqGeZ3Le54VArHSnSA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209042035050.35404@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/9/4 Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>

> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
>
>  On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, "Mario Lobo" <lobo@bsd.com.br> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> All I've done was "csup -L 2 ports-supfile" with ports-www in it.
>>> Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
>>>
>>> As for my /etc/make.conf
>>>
>>> CPUTYPE?=nocona
>>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10
>>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10
>>> WITH_KDE4=yes
>>> WITH_CUPS=yes
>>> WITH_ICONS=KDE4
>>> WITHOUT_GNOME=yes
>>> PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7
>>> PERL_VERSION=5.10.4
>>>
>>> If it is its fault, it will be the first time in around 3,5 years.
>>>
>>
>> did you _only_  csup www in ports? ill have to check but im not sure
>> libvpx
>> is in www... im not in a place to check at this exact second but my memory
>> is that is providing webm support so probably in audio or multimedia
>>
>
> multimedia/libvpx would not have been updated.  Selectively updating ports
> is not supported.  Symlinking libraries to missing versions is often a
> source of mysterious problems later.
>


I had run csup with ports-multimedia since the first libvpx error came up!.
Libvpx was already up to date by the way, and correctly installed. So i did
not Symlink a library to any "missing version".

"Selectively updating ports is not supported".  Then I must wonder why do
we have the option to put "ports-{$port}" inside the supfile, and not a
mandatory ports-all.


@Jan

~]>ident /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk:
$FreeBSD: ports/Mk/bsd.gecko.mk,v 1.63 2012/07/26 23:12:19 flo Exp $

As far as I could find, this seems to be the latest version.

-- 
Mario Lobo
http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br
FreeBSD since version 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99,7% winfoes FREE)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2ByoEx9iwARWTg8Zbrvq3A2G5d1sHp4X2MLBhGn0xcr3ZrwhPQ>