Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:52:18 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: marius@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/dev/dpt dpt.h dpt_eisa.c dpt_scsi.c src/sys/dev/si si.c Message-ID: <20070118.175218.-1641055210.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200701181333.l0IDXbwd098155@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200701181333.l0IDXbwd098155@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <200701181333.l0IDXbwd098155@repoman.freebsd.org>
Marius Strobl <marius@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: marius 2007-01-18 13:33:36 UTC
:
: FreeBSD src repository
:
: Modified files:
: sys/conf options
: sys/dev/dpt dpt.h dpt_eisa.c dpt_scsi.c
: sys/dev/si si.c
: Log:
: Wrap the EISA-specific parts of the dpt(4) and si(4) back-ends in
: the newly added DEV_EISA. This is done so that these back-ends can
: be compiled on platforms not providing in{b,w,l}()/out{b,w,l}() and
: friends (but may wish to use them together with bus front-ends other
: than the EISA one).
Why is dpt_eisa.c even included when EISA isn't included in the
kernel?
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070118.175218.-1641055210.imp>