Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:20:49 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Ash Gokhale <ashfixit@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dtrace: give %'d a chance? Message-ID: <d0bffbcb-0595-9aed-91ad-b81ecd7fd5e7@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAHpe%2B0ZZ64b308hcGfTcPN8Pbv6Ai9LE6FkLhvNUUxLhWTr=7A@mail.gmail.com> References: <d832ce96-c7a9-7aac-b761-27522a02d0ef@FreeBSD.org> <CAHpe%2B0ZZ64b308hcGfTcPN8Pbv6Ai9LE6FkLhvNUUxLhWTr=7A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19/11/2020 15:31, Ash Gokhale wrote: > I'm not a fan of reading nanosecond timestamps ; however This would add work to > downstream scripts that have to toss the prettyprint later; > s|.,()<whatever>||g downstream. Think of the wee awk scripts. > Could we gate the behaviour behind an environment DTRACE_LOCALE or whatever? > > Eh It's getting harder to live in the C locale anyway, the immigration rules > seem to be tightening. Sorry, but you don't have to use %'d. You can keep using %d. > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:29 AM Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org > <mailto:avg@freebsd.org>> wrote: > > > what do people think about adding > setlocale(LC_NUMERIC, ""); > to dtrace's main function? > > My primary interest is to (pretty-)print some numbers with a thousands > separator. > > Not sure if any other LC_ types are worth bothering. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org> mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-dtrace > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-dtrace-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > <mailto:freebsd-dtrace-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>" > -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d0bffbcb-0595-9aed-91ad-b81ecd7fd5e7>