Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:44:34 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Message-ID: <CAF6rxgk5OB4Vm0LYScE26zGNuwRXbgadxu-js3dSChX5q3cbDA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-Y3W38Tqyuh61nZkFA6u%2Bm09s0YEPyQjOzYogpmnAmgQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgksrYpUHU3awBOi-kujcuTfeys5bgH0abgwREPChKyyNw@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83-femOkex-FOvxv%2BtFd3R7GiVv72y9NDgPNUAun-1fjgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgkBweaJnr=RtrVf-Btq42z7=q-rhDMZArwMmGZFk46vDA@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83-Y3W38Tqyuh61nZkFA6u%2Bm09s0YEPyQjOzYogpmnAmgQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2 February 2013 09:37, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 February 2013 14:14, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: >> On 2 February 2013 04:08, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Why not use rel3.stable;.0 instead of hardcoding 8.x and likewise for 9? >> >> No objection here, I'll change that. >> >> Can you confirm the version number and description thereof is correct? >> This is the part I am most concerned about. > > I'm just referring to the way I do it in the Tinderbox README; not > sure if FreeBSD docs have the same scheme as I set up.... you'll have > to test it. It is trivial for me to add entities. However, this is not what I was asking: Is the existing / updated description correct in terms of which versions came from where and when they will be turned into extended release? -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgk5OB4Vm0LYScE26zGNuwRXbgadxu-js3dSChX5q3cbDA>