Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jul 2014 11:12:27 -0500
From:      Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu>
To:        Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Managing multiple repos with Portshaker/Poudriere
Message-ID:  <53C9476B.2030704@my.hennepintech.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CAHzLAVGZ%2B%2BK3dKQbOhVeVnyL7fH62Emontg-Td9iTiqv-r-eSA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAHzLAVGY7PgA-b49qiN2m0djUrJKT4kGTkdeNg0BBFNV6O7L5Q@mail.gmail.com>	<53C9046A.7070805@my.hennepintech.edu> <CAHzLAVGZ%2B%2BK3dKQbOhVeVnyL7fH62Emontg-Td9iTiqv-r-eSA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014.07.18 09:44, Rick Miller wrote:
> I failed to mention that we track the FreeBSD source internally which includes
> customizations.  We have implemented an internal versioning scheme.  The tags
> would be representative of the the internal versioning scheme to associate a
> particular commit to a particular release, similarly to how the FreeBSD project
> does with subversion[1]. 
> 
> 
> [1] http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/tags/
I did not know that revisions of the ports tree were tagged this way. Now I'm
curious why.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53C9476B.2030704>