Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 20:56:42 -0500 From: Randy Berndt <rberndt@nething.com> To: "Mike Burgett" <mburgett@cmnsens.zoom.com>, "hardware@freebsd.org" <hardware@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: K6-200 Has anyone successfully done a 'make world' ? Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19970811205642.00712384@nething.com> In-Reply-To: <199708120034.RAA05790@dragon.cmnsens.zoom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 05:34 PM 8/11/97 -0700, you wrote: >On Mon, 11 Aug 1997 17:22:21 -0700, David Greenman wrote: > >>>I've tried everything but a new chip here, AMD recommended motherboard and >>>cooler and all, without getting through a 'make world'. The new chip is on >>>the way. :) Has *anyone* been able to do a 'make world' successfully with >>>this chip? >> >> I only have the 166MHz part, and have not been successful after changing >>everything except the chip. > >Hmmmm. What started off as an annoyance, is getting *really* interesting. I >wonder if 2_2_RELENG is somehow incompatible with the chip? AMD claims >compatibility with FreeBSD 2.0 on their compatability list, but I wonder if >that included rebuilding all the sources? Seems to run fine when it's just >perking along doing normal stuff'n quick builds... Pardon me for being REALLY dense, but .... Isn't the K6 supposed to be compatible with the Pentium >> CHIP << ??? Not a program that operates on that chip??? If Freebsd uses pentium instructions, how can it become incompatible? Randy Berndt <rberndt@nething.com> ---------------------------------- AOS/VS, Win95, FreeBSD, WinNT, DOS, Win311: I'm caught in a twisty little maze of operating systems, all different.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.3.32.19970811205642.00712384>