Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:01:05 -0500 From: "MikeM" <MyRaQ@mgm51.com> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Remote upgrading (was: /etc/make.conf question) Message-ID: <200203121201050707.044E239E@luna.affordablehost.com> In-Reply-To: <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org> References: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0203121126520.1546-100000@nippur.irb.hr> <20020312074349.A91204@blackhelicopters.org> <20020312155618.GA9463@raggedclown.net> <20020312114158.A92910@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/12/02 at 11:41 AM Michael Lucas wrote: |[snip] |Remember, the correct dance for an upgrade these days includes the |following: | |make buildworld |make buildkernel |make installkernel |<reboot, single-user> |make installworld |mergemaster |<reboot> |[snip] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D I manage a remote FreeBSD server, a single-user reboot is not at all= practical. So my question is: how important, and for what reason, is the= urging to go into single-user mode? On my remote server, I can assure= that I am the only person logged in, I just cannot get into single-user= mode. Will the 'make installworld' and 'mergemaster' steps not work properly in= my scenario? Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203121201050707.044E239E>