Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:44:15 +0100 From: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr To: Pete French <pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk> Cc: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sketchy@netcraft.com Subject: Re: Constantly crashing SMP box Message-ID: <C12569F1.0050F5F6.00@frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to the official SMP specification from Intel this should not mandatory,
according to experiences from an SMP designer, this is absolutely recommended.
YMMV
TfH
PS : the serial numbers of the Celerons of my BP6 are in exact sequence
Pete French <pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk> on 12/02/2001 15:27:13
To: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, Thierry
HERBELOT/FR/ALCATEL@ALCATEL
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sketchy@netcraft.com
Subject: Re: Constantly crashing SMP box
> furthermore, you better have SMP processors with the same stepping
> number (if your processors came from two different boxes, the CPUs
> may have come from different production batches)
Is this an absolute necessity ? I'm thinking of buying a 2nd CPU to
run -stable on, but getting a matching one will be hard !
-pete.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C12569F1.0050F5F6.00>