Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 16:23:39 +0200 (CEST) From: "Jesper Wallin" <z3l3zt@phucking.kicks-ass.org> To: <casey@nixfusion.com> Cc: <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ntpd Message-ID: <1405.213.112.58.75.1018103019.squirrel@phucking.kicks-ass.org> In-Reply-To: <000701c1dd75$f3b1c330$0601a8c0@nixfusion.com> References: <000701c1dd75$f3b1c330$0601a8c0@nixfusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I don't know what to do but I had the same problem on my old Pentium 233MHz MMX.. Thanks for asking this.. :) > > The following messages log entries are concerning me. I don't know > if I > should interpret it as the system isn't updating it's time properly, or > it's time keeping mechanism is bad. > > Apr 6 00:09:19 spareparts ntpd[12778]: kernel time discipline status > 2040 Apr 6 00:12:43 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -72.208070 s > Apr 6 00:12:43 spareparts ntpd[12778]: kernel time discipline status > change 2041 > Apr 6 00:34:02 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -71.751602 s > Apr 6 00:51:18 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -70.855702 s > Apr 6 01:09:32 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -69.938346 s > Apr 6 01:26:46 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -69.033806 s > Apr 6 01:42:51 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -68.149020 s > Apr 6 02:00:04 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -67.230867 s > Apr 6 02:17:13 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -66.324598 s > Apr 6 02:41:46 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -65.367397 s > Apr 6 02:59:00 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -64.338242 s > Apr 6 03:19:21 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -63.355782 s > Apr 6 03:35:37 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -62.464309 s > Apr 6 03:56:01 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -61.472339 s > Apr 6 04:15:18 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -60.512887 s > Apr 6 04:31:19 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -59.651892 s > Apr 6 04:48:32 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -58.749998 s > Apr 6 05:05:36 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -57.872887 s > Apr 6 05:22:43 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -56.942257 s > Apr 6 05:45:14 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -55.909788 s > Apr 6 06:02:31 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -54.998330 s > Apr 6 06:25:09 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -54.157019 s > Apr 6 06:34:50 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -53.274896 s > Apr 6 06:58:22 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -52.248662 s > Apr 6 07:14:29 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -51.331915 s > Apr 6 07:37:01 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -50.367300 s > Apr 6 07:48:49 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -49.530241 s > Apr 6 08:04:54 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -48.663439 s > Apr 6 08:26:22 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -47.709321 s > Apr 6 08:41:21 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -46.791000 s > Apr 6 09:04:57 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -45.934261 s > Apr 6 09:12:26 spareparts ntpd[12778]: time slew -45.155585 s > > Isn't the system suppose to adjust it's time after the ntp query > provides the correct time? Why does it only seem to be getting better a > second or so at a time? I would appreciate any advice. > > Thanks in advance, > Casey > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1405.213.112.58.75.1018103019.squirrel>