Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 21:15:38 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? Message-ID: <200006280315.VAA51742@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:06:28 EDT." <20000627230628.F42285@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <20000627230628.F42285@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <200006272329.RAA50325@harmony.village.org> <10451.962149487@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000627230628.F42285@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Will Andrews writes: : On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 04:44:47PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: : > Well, I've certainly seen more "I'm against it!" cries than I've seen : > "I'm for it!", leading me towards thinking that maybe it's Just Not : > Worth It and the standard lpr is just fine and can be augmented by : > apsfilter for those who want more out of it. : : I concur. : : My motivation for originally supporting LPRng was because the 26,000 : lines of code extra (or whatever it was) was much less than the amount : of junk apsfilter installs that I don't need. I'm starting to agree. We also have a new lpr maintainer on deck, so I think that lpr/lpd stuff will be much better handled in the future now that we have someone "fulltime" to look at it. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006280315.VAA51742>