Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:44:40 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hints static wiring Message-ID: <200008291944.NAA10934@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Aug 2000 14:24:06 CDT." <14764.3542.322382.773438@guru.mired.org> References: <14764.3542.322382.773438@guru.mired.org> <20000827184037.A22500@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <14762.8323.382969.782508@guru.mired.org> <39AA3882.914FC0A0@cvzoom.net> <14762.14890.276820.183791@guru.mired.org> <39AA5DC6.8D73081B@FreeBSD.org> <14762.24829.363032.115605@guru.mired.org> <39AA6699.41E12730@FreeBSD.org> <14762.26659.335.344828@guru.mired.org> <20000829102526.A11422@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20000828182921.A31041@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20000829103024.A5567@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <14764.3542.322382.773438@guru.mired.org> Mike Meyer writes: : I suspect I'm going to be one of those people, but let's ask the next : question. How do the two approaches compare from a performance : standpoint? Completely identical. One loads the table from a file, the other reads it from the kernel. : Basically, which will provide the smallest running kernel, and if it's : the same, which will boot fastest? They should be the same size. I'd be surprised if you could measure a difference. You'll get more savings by not compiling in just one driver. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008291944.NAA10934>