Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:13:59 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Equivilant of 'lsmod' Message-ID: <20090824221359.GA65007@kokopelli.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20090824205839.GB28580@comcast.net> References: <20090824152932.0780db11@scorpio.seibercom.net> <20090824193309.GI77498@dan.emsphone.com> <4A92EDA6.2020809@lemonia.org> <20090824205839.GB28580@comcast.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:58:39PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Mon 24 Aug 2009 at 12:44:38 PDT Dunc wrote: > > > >I think he wanted to know what the equivalent of the Linux 'lsmod' > >command is. > > Is kldstat 100% semantically congruent with lsmod? I.e., are there > things you can do with lsmod that you can't with kldstat? > > A quick comparison of the manpages will probably give the answer, but it > will save everyone some time if the OP explains what he wants to do that > he would have used lsmod for if this were Linux. > > Besides, not everyone here is familiar with Linux and not everyone wants > to spend any time learning it. Just giving the Linux command for > something means you're unnecessarily narrowing down the number of people > who can give you an answer. Don't confuse the issue with facts! -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Richard Pattis: "If you cannot grok the overall structure of a program while taking a shower, e.g., with no external memory aids, you are not ready to code it." [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqTEKcACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUpWgCfUQGLz15KNFXX6mDz+c4nldZw JuEAn2rIq/nFg95SpA2MbPY9n9bCFl7u =x2t+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090824221359.GA65007>