Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 14:48:59 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: send problem on udp socket... Message-ID: <200102071948.OAA45795@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <3A818B31.9B12C8B3@softweyr.com> References: <200102071714.f17HEDH75274@iguana.aciri.org> <20010207093731.N26076@fw.wintelcom.net> <3A818B31.9B12C8B3@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 07 Feb 2001 10:51:45 -0700, Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> said: > A starting point, increment, and ceiling NMBCLUSTERS *is* the ceiling. No memory is actually allocated (although virtual address space is) until those clusters are actually requested. > based on the memory size of the system That would be an improvement, but recall that many of these sorts of parameters are there in order to limit fragmentation of the kernel virtual address space. There's no safe way to GC kernel virtual space. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102071948.OAA45795>