Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:50:15 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CONF class of files Message-ID: <BANLkTikbF4_CifAzaAOUXYVYxyu8X3po2A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <379A724C-4458-4E5C-81E9-CF125666E203@FreeBSD.org> References: <BANLkTinkhTzy9aOw0SzcQWff8p8COrVPNw@mail.gmail.com> <379A724C-4458-4E5C-81E9-CF125666E203@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 June 2011 09:15, Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote:
>> Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files,
>> in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN,
>> CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR.
>>
>> Please would someone review and give an opinion on [1]?
>
> Shouldn't $CONFDIR be set to ${PREFIX}/etc/ instead of /etc?
>
> Also, if we define $CONFDIR, we should use it everywhere in bsd.*.mk where we currently use some form of */etc/* - otherwise we will get a mismatch if $CONFDIR is changed from the default.
>
CONFDIR is for base, not ports, just like most other stuff in that
file. Have a look at the other DIR variables.
Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikbF4_CifAzaAOUXYVYxyu8X3po2A>