Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:23:08 -0700 From: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Message-ID: <20100408202308.GA61756@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20100328163828.1f34e0e7@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >Hi, > > >As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports >are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 >April. > >The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib >version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > >We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, >and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. > >Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and >http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built >to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. >We also have two incremental builds on Pointy to catch the problems. > > >Thank you, > >With hat: portmgr@ Sorry if this seems like nagging, but since we're now past the original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100408202308.GA61756>