Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:48:34 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> To: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OpenZFS support merged Message-ID: <20200830064834.GU3539@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <CAPrugNrGqBgqvequawRt=wQ_=TFT5S47J6UKK32Fw7rLmdN6cg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPrugNrgNUpaG3Wd=3crdsKV4iA83w%2B32hyzYbW0j_omOTo%2BwA@mail.gmail.com> <20200829154727.GS3539@home.opsec.eu> <CAPrugNrGqBgqvequawRt=wQ_=TFT5S47J6UKK32Fw7rLmdN6cg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > > > I caution against 'zpool upgrade' for the next few weeks. > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=364746 > > A system running r363767 can upgrade to some revision after r364746 > > and reboot and come up without big issues, running the new openzfs code ? > > Or is some additional step required ? > Barring some unusual configuration that no one else there should not be a > problem. The only known issue of immediate concern (that was only raised a > day or two ago :-/) is zfs delegation in poudriere. This is my package builder box, where I also receive mail, so ... 8-} > If you rely on that I'd say wait a couple days, otherwise proceed. It has it's files on a ZPOOL. How can I find if my poudriere uses zfs delegation ? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/zfs-zfs-allow.html says something about: sysctl vfs.usermount which returns 0 (so no usermounts) and: zfs allow -l zroot/pou which returns empty. So I guess I can upgrade. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200830064834.GU3539>