Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 13:27:00 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Da Rock <freebsd-wireless@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Atheros QCA9377 driver? Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=O4hRX%2BZmOYSh9Yjpn7-PENMvzz7Y53uLHUMTn4Y-hUg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2ddfc0c2-71b9-bfd0-1190-ab3ffb0cd14b@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <2ddfc0c2-71b9-bfd0-1190-ab3ffb0cd14b@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi QCA9377 will require ath10k to show up in freebsd-head. It's not an 11n part like the other AR93xx / AR95xx series part numbers. -adrian On 20 July 2017 at 19:00, Da Rock <freebsd-wireless@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > I just got a new laptop which I went to the trouble of testing hardware > prior (worked afaict btw - FBSD11-RC3), but now in the light of day I have > done the full install and now computer says no. The only diff I can tell is > I used the iso for the test image, and now I used the memstick image - ce la > vie. > > What I need to know is that the various freebsd wiki pages for wifi mention > the 9300's are different and work needs to be done for support, that -head > should just work now, and the real kicker - it was updated about 3-4 years > ago! So FBSD11 should definitely be considered a derivative of -head by now, > right? > > I'll also point out that it specifically mentioned a porting back to -9, so > there's that also. This was in ath_hal/9300 > > Bottom line: so what's the status? And if it should be going, why isn't it? > > cheers > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=O4hRX%2BZmOYSh9Yjpn7-PENMvzz7Y53uLHUMTn4Y-hUg>