Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:47:19 +0900
From:      JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
To:        "Jay Austad" <austad@marketwatch.com>
Cc:        <net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: gif0 tunnel and rip (using zebra)
Message-ID:  <y7v7kp5lovs.wl@condor.jinmei.org>
In-Reply-To: <54180709DD3FE145917BB165AFE7EFA002E0D4A3@mspexch2.office.mktw.net>
References:  <F158Ir6dZqN3SsxoqwN00003fcf@hotmail.com> <54180709DD3FE145917BB165AFE7EFA002E0D4A3@mspexch2.office.mktw.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:13:51 -0600, 
>>>>> "Jay Austad" <austad@marketwatch.com> said:

> I'm trying to propagate rip routes using zebra (ripd) across a gif0
> tunnel interface to another freebsd box running zebra.  

> I have zebra and ripd running, but they only seem to broadcast routes
> out the fxp0 interface, and not across the gif0 tunnel.  It's quite
> annoying.  A "show ip protocols" in the ripd vty shows that both fxp0
> and gif0 are sending and receiving RIP updates.  However tcpdump shows
> otherwise.  I really don't need to use zebra, but I'd like to.  

I guess you should ask the question at the zebra mailing list.

> The endpoints on the gif0 tunnel are tied down to addresses assigned to
> the lo1 interface on each side.  Should I tie these down to the
> addresses assigned to fxp0 instead?

You do not have to do that.

> Also, does FreeBSD 4.5 support GRE tunnels?

No, as far as I know.

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?y7v7kp5lovs.wl>