Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:56:01 +0000 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <261DDEE0-B792-4715-A8EF-27E491122BD2@gid.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > On 10 Nov 2015, at 09:42, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: >=20 > [=E2=80=A6] >=20 > Therefore, I would like to remove the HPN patches from base and refer > anyone who really needs them to the openssh-portable port, which has > them as a default option. I would also like to remove the NONE cipher > patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like = in > base). Can=E2=80=99t argue with that. Is removing HPN going to impact the = performance of tunnelled X connexions? > DES > --=20 > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?261DDEE0-B792-4715-A8EF-27E491122BD2>