Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:33:36 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Kevin Lyons <klyons@corserv.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re; tcsh is not csh Message-ID: <20041112153336.GH2431@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <4194D4BC.3060103@corserv.com> References: <419406E5.6050902@corserv.com> <4194CA3E.4010601@gamersimpact.com> <4194D4BC.3060103@corserv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:20:28AM -0600, Kevin Lyons wrote: > FreeBSD - does not work (they knew better and renamed tcsh csh rather=20 > than just calling a spade a spade, some commit bit vandal got a hair to= =20 > rename parts of the world for the sake of mankind.) [...] > >I'm not opposed to adding a real csh to /bin, but if we're only adding= =20 > >it to work around a minor incompatability that few if any programs rely= =20 > >on I don't see it as being a necessity. >=20 > And the microsoft mentality lives on. God help freebsd. You know, I actually thought you had a point hidden inside those ugly words somewhere. Care to share it in a civil way? --Stijn --=20 My server has more fans than Britney. -- Steve Warwick, from a posting at questions@freebsd.org --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBlNfQY3r/tLQmfWcRAnr2AJ4i+S+XeVar+bsQWBjcwK3mxNOT/ACfb0/Q lDSTiBE23mokh4CyDVtNnxA= =5KZj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041112153336.GH2431>