Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 03:31:49 -0800 (PST) From: Murray Stokely <murray@osd.bsdi.com> To: Arjan Knepper <jak01@pop3.NL.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 and STL Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0103280329530.73063-100000@meow.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <3AC1A050.62BE0194@pop3.NL.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Arjan Knepper wrote:
% Could anyone make recommandations on the STL to use with C++. I'm using
% the build in gcc 2.95.2 on -stable and build in gcc 2.95.3 on -current.
%
% What is preffered the build-in STL (/usr/include/g++) or STLport?
In general you should stick with the built-in STL. However, you
may find it lacks certain features of the standard. The GCC team is
slowly bringing STLport into their tree. For the moment, OpenOffice,
at least requires STLport.
- Murray
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0103280329530.73063-100000>