Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 03:07:48 +0100 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dependencies...how do they work? Message-ID: <853.831089268@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 1996 21:47:59 EDT." <Pine.NEB.3.93.960502214612.22903A-100000@freebsd.ki.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Marc G. Fournier" wrote in message ID <Pine.NEB.3.93.960502214612.22903A-100000@freebsd.ki.net>: > Nope, not using 'make obj' on that system...didn't allocate > enough space to seperate obj from src :( So obj/src are on the same > file system... > My first thought had been that maybe when pte.h got removed, > it wasn't completely removed from the other include files, but as I stated, > I can't find it anywhere :( Weird. Most weird. You can see what mkdep is working from if you take the cc command line and add a `-E' flag to it. (You'll need the full command line to get all the options right. Cut and paste is handy for this :-) ). I'd advise redirecting stdout to a file as it'll be quite lengthy. This may highlight a problem area somewhere. I can't think why mkdep gets different information to a normal compile. They SHOULD use the same flags, etc, so should end up with the same results... Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD - Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?853.831089268>