Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:37:10 -0600 (CST) From: quel@quelrod.net To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb 2.0 dell inspirion 8500 Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211536410.31552@quelrod.net> In-Reply-To: <20031121211627.GF74178@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211044430.27469@quelrod.net> <Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211509070.32752@quelrod.net> <20031121211627.GF74178@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Could you point me to information as to why it is not in GENERIC? -James On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, quel@quelrod.net wrote: > > Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then? > > It is intentionally not in GENERIC. > > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, quel@quelrod.net wrote: > > > > I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s > > > > transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing 1.0: > > > > usb0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A> on uhci0 > > > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > > > usb1: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-B> on uhci1 > > > > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > > > > usb2: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-C> on uhci2 > > > > usb2: USB revision 1.0 > > > > > > > > (Yes i double checked my laptop does indeed have usb 2.0) > > > > > > > > I saw that ehci had usb 2.0 support comitted. Is this coming for uhci? I > > > > suppose it's too late to get this into 5.2 -RELEASE. > > > > > > uhci is strictly an usb1.x controller. > > > Build a kernel with ehci support if you have a high speed capable > > > controller. > > -- > B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de > ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSO.4.56.0311211536410.31552>