Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:05:24 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Zahemszky G?bor <Gabor@Zahemszky.HU> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bundled openssl version Message-ID: <20090925220524.GC1275@arthur.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20090827192946.7f5782c3@Picasso.Zahemszky.HU> References: <25ae98a90908270451m1d3c17b2nab12dc259f808848@mail.gmail.com> <A7CAA46C10B540FC9029FBACF651EA98@nb03> <20090827192946.7f5782c3@Picasso.Zahemszky.HU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2009.08.27 19:29:46 +0200, Zahemszky G?bor wrote: > >> I'm just puzzled why we still stick to 0.9.8e. It's almost ancient. > >> Why not 0.9.8f? Doesn't someone need TLS extensions working? > > > Why don't you use security/openssl ? > > Why do we need a port, if we can / could use the program from the base > system? Well, 0.9.8f is also rather ancient :-). Anyway: [simon@frankie:~] openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009 [simon@frankie:~] uname -a FreeBSD frankie.nitro.dk 8.0-RC1 FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 #0: Thu Sep 17 20:45:19 UTC 2009 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I also hope to MFC it to 7-stable, but I need to check that the ABI and ABI is compatible first... -- Simon L. Nielsen Hat: OpenSSL janitor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090925220524.GC1275>