Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:17:03 +0200 From: "Cedric GROSS" <cg@cgross.info> To: <sbruno@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: RE: [IWN] Review Message-ID: <002e01cec8f0$71c400e0$554c02a0$@info> In-Reply-To: <1381762883.2593.0.camel@localhost> References: <002701cebc6f$634c0040$29e400c0$@info> <CAJ-VmonSS9Y9X0=3XndD-JX6boSW7NcGXwyv0Ra3e5%2B0UEaUhg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmom_YD-1p85hNfAQBte9AjfZ7N6U-=%2B%2Bc4qw9VZcSKB66g@mail.gmail.com> <003301cebdeb$fc941350$f5bc39f0$@info> <1381762883.2593.0.camel@localhost>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_bruno@yahoo.com] > À : Cedric GROSS > Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Objet : RE: [IWN] Review > > On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote: > > Hello, > > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now. > > > > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD. > > Cedric > > Cedric: Hi Sean, > > Which branch should we be testing? > As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC. Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC series. Could be a good idea to test this version with à lot of NIC. > sean Thanks Cedrichelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002e01cec8f0$71c400e0$554c02a0$>