Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:59:14 +0100 From: "Antoine Brodin" <antoine@freebsd.org> To: "Norikatsu Shigemura" <nork@freebsd.org> Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Subject: Re: Change select(2) to kevent(2) on script(1)... Message-ID: <f19c444a0812220759i44707666oc91e25cda225d75b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081223002901.9b71e60d.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <20081221012752.cdc5cbfc.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20081221211949.GS1176@hoeg.nl> <20081222091203.GA28920@freebsd.org> <494F740E.3040502@FreeBSD.org> <20081223002901.9b71e60d.nork@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> wrote: > I think that performance improvement is significant(I don't > think performance improved by my patch). But my patch is the > first implementation of kqueue/kevent support for TTY. > In fact, I could find a bug. I hope to commit my patch. But > by performance reason, my patch is not accepted, I have no > problem. Hi, Could you make it a compile time option, similar to the USE_KQUEUE option in make(1) ? I had to write something similar to script(1) for work recently, that ran on linux, and the freebsd sources were quite useful. Cheers, Antoinehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f19c444a0812220759i44707666oc91e25cda225d75b>