Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 13:17:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Dexnation Holodream <dex@wankers.net> To: laurens van alphen <lva@dds.nl> Cc: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: 2.2.6 page fault (Prev: Re: 2.2.7 crash) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980807131627.18145A-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <000101bdc1dc$4f08bae0$0a00a8c0@uptight.student.utwente.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, laurens van alphen wrote: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > today i got the same error when the box was pretty idle: > > > fault virtual address = 0x12a > > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > > intstruction pointer = 0x8:0xf01182b7 > > stack pointer = 0x10:0xefbffb5c > > frame pointer = 0x10:0xefbffb7c > > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > > current process = 11 (fsck) > > interupt mask = > > panic: page fault > > those address might have been different, i can't read THAT quickly ;) > > > syncing disks... 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 giving up > > it probably did that correctly though... > this is our first freebsd box (2.2.7) and has been runnin' in an testenv. > for a few weeks now. > > cheers, If you could replicate this, and we could debug a bit, it'd help...at least it didn't double fault, though...for a while when I was working on Solaris 2.6 x86, we were double faulting during specific tests...talk about a nightmare to trace... -Jon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980807131627.18145A-100000>