Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:15:11 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: ru@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: color, again, in grotty Message-ID: <20021018161511.GA12504@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20021018.094801.123456703.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20021017.101833.110719994.imp@bsdimp.com> <20021018095026.GA3386@sunbay.com> <20021018.094801.123456703.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:48:01 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > I know that there sre terminals for which the SGR sequences screw > things up. I had to deal with a raft of Televideo terminals back in Moreover, output device can be not terminal (f.e. printer). > : 2. Stay compatible with the new standard (11 years old ANSI std). > : This means we fix syscons(4) so that it renders "underscore" > : distinguishable from "bold", and change the default pager to We can't "fix" syscons without making bold the same like some other attribute or color. Current underline mapping is added for compatibility only, it not means to be used at all, i.e. if you check cons25 termcap entry, there is no underline. So think like underline not exist at all, so can't be fixed by definition. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021018161511.GA12504>