Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 15:37:16 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: One True Awk upgrade Message-ID: <CANCZdfpaO9n%2BL6Ntwd-TDK9jpcyTaEg6eQe7QnUntm4idMkSWg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfptGR2DTFP0ADFPB4M-1GgOLAXqLFBxnj-Wz6wjRzwP=Q@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 10:55 AM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > I'm upgrading the in-tree version of one-true-awk. Normally, this isn't a > problem, but there's a number of small differences I'm still trying > to figure out due to our... contorted history. Some of the revisions we had > in the vendor branch of our repo were accepted as-is, some completely, and > some not yet, We've also added bug fixes we've found, as well as fixes from > other BSDs, which has also caused at least one unexplained difference. > > I should have it sorted out in the next day or so, but wanted to give a > heads up. I doubt anybody would notice, but each of the differences is > going to take a little time to sort out, chase back to the failing case, > work out with upstream if there's a bug or not, etc. There's also a small > window between r348513 and r348515 where the tree fails to build (due to > svn's commit subtree vs git's commit while tree differences). > > Also, I've not tagged this as such, but my plans are to MFC to 12 next > week, and to 11 after 11.3R goes out the door. > OK. I've resolved all the diffs between the git-tree I had and what made it into the tree. the upgrade is now complete, and I've pushed my notion of what awk should be to the bsd-ota branch in https://github.com/bsdimp/awk.git I'll work on folding them into upstream, although some of them are quite old and I'm unsure if they are appropriate for upstream... Warnerhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfpaO9n%2BL6Ntwd-TDK9jpcyTaEg6eQe7QnUntm4idMkSWg>