Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:52:15 -0400 From: mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Helge Oldach <freebsd@oldach.net>, Zhenlei Huang <zlei.huang@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing changes from Sept 7th and possible ppp breakage (RELENG_13) Message-ID: <24c853a3-bd84-58ac-e835-919f31b4d9ad@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <202109101534.18AFYarp001702@nuc.oldach.net> References: <202109101534.18AFYarp001702@nuc.oldach.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/10/2021 11:34 AM, Helge Oldach wrote: > Zhenlei Huang wrote on Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:34:20 +0200 (CEST): >>> On Sep 10, 2021, at 5:38 AM, mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote: >>> default 10.255.255.1 UGS 6 1500 igb0 >>> default 10.1.0.1 UGS 17 1500 tun10 >>> >>> Where as now, it doesnt seem to replace it, it seems to just add >>> another default route. >> At first glance it seems that ppp does not check existing default >> route before replacing it with a new one. > My thinking as well. Similar thing (creating kind-of an overlay network) > with openvpn results in a single default route - apparently the original > one is properly removed before adding openvpn's own default route. > One other thing I noticed is that net.route.multipath is RO on i386 but RW on AMD64. Is that intentional for some reason ? ---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24c853a3-bd84-58ac-e835-919f31b4d9ad>