Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:54:01 +0000 From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Specifying alternative file for devd(8) Message-ID: <20051121135401.GA94609@freebsd.czest.pl> In-Reply-To: <200511211011.29745.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <20051120172755.GA85641@freebsd.czest.pl> <84dead720511200943ua2cf8b8y49bff0dcf3e2fa63@mail.gmail.com> <20051120183037.GA85917@freebsd.czest.pl> <200511211011.29745.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:11:28AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:00, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote: > > > You should probably also mention in the manual page that > > > only one (the last) '-f' option has an effect. > > > > Every options has an effect and (somehow) modifies application behavour. I > > don't see a reason why to mention it, since it's already explained. If you > > think it's really needed, let me know, I'll make another update. > > He means that you should mention that multiple -f options are not additive. > > ie you can't do > devd -f config1 -f config2 > > and have devd "merge" the 2 configuration files. Sorry and thanks for the explanation. Updated patch: http://freebsd.czest.pl/dunstan/FreeBSD/diff.2.devd -- * Wojciech A. Koszek && dunstan@FreeBSD.czest.pl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051121135401.GA94609>