Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:09:54 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PCI SIO devices hog interrupts, cause lock order problems Message-ID: <p06002097bd59e277004f@[10.0.1.3]> In-Reply-To: <20040830.223021.70219797.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20040830192316.6B6CD12351@shub-internet.kew.com><56850.10938943 70@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040830.223021.70219797.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:30 PM -0600 2004-08-30, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : This could be vastly improved if the data structure puc uses were
> : more intelligent. Man cards could be described simply by their
> : PCI ID and "fill resource #1 with sio ports" rather than the very
> : space consuming and errorprone stuff we do now.
>
> The stuff we do now is trying to be too smart. Most single port cards
> are like phk says, but multiport is where things really go wonkies...
Go wonkies?!? OMG ROTFLMAOTIPMTU!!!
I think this *has* to qualify as the funniest thing I have ever
heard you say or seen you type!
--
Brad Knowles, <brad@stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002097bd59e277004f>