Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 17:25:55 +0100 From: Clemens Hermann <haribeau@gmx.de> To: Enrico Giakas <Enrico.Giakas@ccrle.nec.de> Cc: FreeBSD security ML <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Juniper firewall Message-ID: <20011122172555.A241@homer.local> In-Reply-To: <598111959.1006448896@[192.168.102.87]> von Enrico Giakas <Enrico.Giakas@ccrle.nec.de> am 22.Nov.2001 um 17:08:16 (%2B0100) References: <20011122144748.A241@homer.local> <598111959.1006448896@[192.168.102.87]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 22.11.2001 um 17:08:16 schrieb Enrico Giakas: Hi Enrico, > Try the NEC SOCKS5-Proxy Firewall (it is free) from the site: > http://www.socks.nec.com/cgi-bin/download.pl thanks for the hint. Isn't Socks like NAT with authentication (in the result)? Does Socks offer any kind of filtering on the application-layer? Am I wrong in my assumption that a "real" application proxy can offer more security e.g. by not allowing to misuse open ports for any app on non-standard ports? /ch -- Wieviele Mitarbeiter von Microsoft benoetigt man fuer das auswechseln einer defekten Gluehbirne? Keine, Microsoft erklaert die Dunkelheit zum Marktstandart. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011122172555.A241>