Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 15:07:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org> To: Dima Ruban <dima@best.net> Cc: Masafumi =?us-ascii?Q?NAKANE=2F=3D=3Fiso=2D2022=2Djp=3FB=3FGyRCQ2Y6LDJ?= =?us-ascii?Q?tSjgbKEI=3D=3F=3D?= <max@wide.ad.jp>, hoek@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/mirror Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980816150441.1327C-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <199808161857.LAA27683@burka.rdy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 16 Aug 1998, Dima Ruban wrote:
> I think, we should have something like:
> PERL5?= ${PREFIX}/bin/perl${PERL_VERSION}
> in bsd.port.mk and
>
> use ${PERL5} instead of ${PREFIX}/bin/perl in all the Makefiles.
I don't use this funky perl5 stuff, but can't ports just use
"${PREFIX}/bin/perl5"? That's no more complicated than hundreds
of other similar paths in the ports tree.
Or is "perl5" not always guaranteed to be a link to the latest,
greatest perl version?
--
This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980816150441.1327C-100000>