Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Mar 1996 11:26:51 -0300 (EST)
From:      "Lenzi, Sergio" <lenzi@cwbone.bsi.com.br>
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Quality of BSD software
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960319111413.4593A-100000@lenzi>
In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.960318142126.petera@peterapc.bristol.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello all.

In an answer from a request for information about Win/U here is what 
they sad:

> 
> Thank you for your interest in Wind/U, which enables you to take 
> your Windows applications to multiple Unix and VMS platforms 
> with only a single source required.
> 
> We do not support Linux or FreeBSD, primarily due to the
                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> quality of the compilers that work with these operating systems.

I am very satisfyed with the quality of the BSD compilers and operating
system. In fact I think it is better than SCO or UNIXWARE compilers that
has bugs in the libc.

Can someone please evaluate this and perhaps convince the Win/U that
BSD has "quality" compilers??? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960319111413.4593A-100000>