Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:04:35 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org> Subject: Re: docs/50349: make release fails with NO_OPENSSH and ! NOKERBEROS Message-ID: <20031006120435.GB76051@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20031006115301.GA52277@sunbay.com> References: <20031004190337.GB94900@sunbay.com> <200310041930.h94JUCYJ065458@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20031005041432.GC9334@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20031005184629.GB37106@sunbay.com> <20031006102006.GA76051@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20031006115301.GA52277@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 02:53:01PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:20:06PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 09:46:29PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:14:32AM -0400, Ken Smith wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:30:12PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > > The crypto stuff in nicely separated out, and I wouldn't mind see= ing > > > > > further separation (dev tools, LPR, sendmail, etc) done as separa= tely > > > > > installable components, similar to the crypto install. > > > >=20 > > > > A current interest is having some sort of binary updates system > > > > in place. Everyone I talk to about the various issues, projects in > > > > motion, etc. say this further separation of stuff would help that > > > > effort a LOT. > > > >=20 > > > The (crypto) stuff is already well separated, it's just that > > > we don't want to further complicate release/Makefile to > > > account for the NOCRYPT option -- it's much easier to remove > > > the unneeded bits after release is rolled. > >=20 > > What about this then: > >=20 > > [stijn@pcwin002] <~> ldd /usr/bin/fetch=20 > > /usr/bin/fetch: > > libfetch.so.3 =3D> /usr/lib/libfetch.so.3 (0x28076000) > > libssl.so.3 =3D> /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x28083000) > > libcrypto.so.3 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x280b5000) > > libc.so.5 =3D> /lib/libc.so.5 (0x281c3000) > >=20 > > It seems to me that a release build with crypto and installed without > > will miss /usr/bin/fetch, or will it simply not work? Haven't tried yet, > > but I was just wondering. > >=20 > cd /usr/src/release && make -V FIXCRYPTO >=20 > You should see the usr.bin/fetch there; this means that the release.3 > stage of "make release" recompiles it without crypto support and puts > the crypto-free binary into the "base" distribution. OK, good to know, thanks for your time! --Stijn --=20 Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/gVpTY3r/tLQmfWcRArarAKCiE1dHAxwVirCcC+zHbs4lLBM0EwCfREV2 fJkj6M9mVCOTUg1rHPro9oY= =2sGb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031006120435.GB76051>