Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:12:14 -0800
From:      darklogik@pittgoth.com
To:        Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: elderly anchors
Message-ID:  <3C1757AE.9904.90CE4C8@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20011212123254.A45773@blackhelicopters.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Such tags should go away!  I honestly don't see a use for them 
other than pointing out where you are in a document blah blah blah, 
in essance I don't see a use.  Correct my opinion if i'm wrong pls

Tom Rhodes



On 12 Dec 2001, at 12:32, Michael Lucas wrote:

> At one point, we used anchor to point to particular sections in the
> FAQ.  Then some selfless non-committer put in a couple of PRs to add
> question id= tags to each and every question in the blasted thing.
> 
> In quite a few (not all!) cases, it appears that the anchor tags are
> moot with that addition.
> 
>       <qandaentry>
>         <question id="dangerously-dedicated">
>           <para>Will a <quote>dangerously dedicated</quote> disk endanger
>             my health?</para>
>         </question>
> 
>         <answer>
> 
>           <para><anchor id="dedicate">T
> 
> Am I missing something, or should such tags go away?
> 
> ==ml
> 
> -- 
> Michael Lucas		mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org
> My FreeBSD column: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons
> 
> http://www.blackhelicopters.org/~mwlucas/
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C1757AE.9904.90CE4C8>