Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Jun 2024 20:29:49 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 279546] ctladm.8 is inconsistent about "ctladm port"'s "-l" option
Message-ID:  <bug-279546-9-VS584unIv0@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-279546-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279546

--- Comment #2 from Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> ---
It is hard to recall why have I done that 9 years ago, but it seems `ctladm
port -l` is equivalent to `ctladm portlist`.  And `-x` and `-q` arguments are
useless  without `-l`.  I guess I could keep it in the code to not break
existing scripts, while remove from documentation to make it more clear.  May
be I was going to clean up code later, but it just never happened.  I don't
think I'd like restoring the documentation, preferring probably further
cleanup.  Whether to remove the actual code, I don't have preference.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-279546-9-VS584unIv0>