Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:27:18 +0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mksnap_ffs mksnap_ffs.c Message-ID: <20040128092718.GB32487@frontfree.net> In-Reply-To: <xzpwu7c77lz.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200401271933.i0RJXGRW080759@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040128025015.GP565@garage.freebsd.pl> <xzpwu7c77lz.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:19:52AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Pawel Jakub Dawidek <nick@garage.freebsd.pl> writes: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:33:16AM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > Branch: RELENG_5_1 > > Are you sure this is the right branch? > > Yes. Why would it not be? Quick question: Will this result in a security advisory? Or it will only a version bump in the security branch? Personally, I'd prefer a silent version bump. Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij frontfree net> http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAF4B2OfuToMruuMARAvHDAJkBLYend8BYppk9v0rC/ruQOIEHcwCfeogY cAVBe3tdhhKfroedP3XDJNQ= =sot1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- [-- Attachment #3 --] Scanned by evaluation version of Dr.Web antivirus Daemon http://drweb.ru/unix/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040128092718.GB32487>