Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 22:21:20 +0500 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@ixsystems.com> To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What happened with the GlusterFS port? Message-ID: <253AE3BB-AA64-44B1-AA4D-31C8B6B99863@ixsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20140419171435.GD15884@in-addr.com> References: <28234312-7982-49F5-83FD-865649AA9CCB@ultra-secure.de> <1397850220.58880.16.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <CAKYr3zybY3hdXLpL-fCvqs%2B=syZ7uBE-FiXj%2BXcRGG1YoUZhOQ@mail.gmail.com> <1397855188.58880.26.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <CAKYr3zy_bQUiE0AFMvkw2crAp2uvhfwbvcbsCmS0ZAg5TLeL0w@mail.gmail.com> <20140419171435.GD15884@in-addr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 19, 2014, at 10:14 PM, Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> wrote: > Building ceph 0.72.2 on FreeBSD is non-trivial by the looks of it due = to > too many non-portable Linuxisms. Hope their porting effort moves = forward. I=92ve tried. It=92s a long ways off from building and running on = FreeBSD, and even with a rough port, there are certain features (the = filesystem hooks) which we=92ll have to either settle for as a FUSE = port, which means somewhat less performance, or create the requisite = shims. Unfortunately, it doesn=92t seem like anyone in the CEPH project = itself uses anything but Linux, which is probably key. - Jordan P.S. Hey Gary, gee, long time!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?253AE3BB-AA64-44B1-AA4D-31C8B6B99863>