Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 09:48:56 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, babkin@users.sourceforge.net, babkin@verizon.net, scottl@samsco.org Subject: Re: locking in a device driver Message-ID: <436A4D88.5070105@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20051103.092325.119936663.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20669850.1131022662391.JavaMail.root@vms061.mailsrvcs.net> <20051103.092325.119936663.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote: >In message: <20669850.1131022662391.JavaMail.root@vms061.mailsrvcs.net> > Sergey Babkin <babkin@verizon.net> writes: >: Maybe it can be fixed in the kernel without >: too much trouble. > >It already is in libthr and libposix. They already use execution >contexts to map M threads onto N contexts. libc_r is being retired >and not worth the effort to modernize. > >Since there's really no good threading paradigm in 4.x and since it is >also being retired, I don't think it is worth the effort there. > > I suggest linking with the linuxthreads port. >Warner >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?436A4D88.5070105>