Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      20 Jul 1999 12:45:56 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
To:        John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Overcommit and calloc()
Message-ID:  <xzpk8rvbnvf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney's message of "Tue, 20 Jul 1999 03:19:08 -0700"
References:  <002201bed217$e94beae0$291c453f@kbyanc.alcnet.com> <xzppv1nbpir.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <19990720031908.63115@hydrogen.fircrest.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@efn.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav scribbled this message on Jul 20:
> > When I allocate memory, I usually intend to put something in it.
> > There's always the odd struct sockaddr_in which I bzero() before
> > filling it in, but they're usually on the stack.
> and even then, I don't believe in filling sockaddr_in w/ bzero, I
> believe in using getsockaddr on it so that you actually get all the
> fields filled out properly...

See? One less reason to use bzero() / calloc() :)

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk8rvbnvf.fsf>